A security lapse in the Trump administration led to The Atlantic’s editor being mistakenly added to a private chat discussing bombing Yemen, prompting bipartisan calls in Congress for a thorough investigation
Trump officials testified that no classified info or war plans were shared in a Signal chat that mistakenly included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg. Goldberg claimed leaked operational details, but officials denied any sensitive disclosures.
Jeffrey Goldberg's Atlantic story exposes how Trump officials inadvertently included a journalist in a Signal chat detailing plans to bomb Houthi rebels in Yemen, creating a scenario that sounds like a plot rejected from a thriller.
Trump allies defend NS advisor Waltz after a Signal chat leaked war plans for Yemen, calling the uproar exaggerated. Despite Democrats urging his firing over the embarrassing lapse, top officials expect the scandal to blow over and Waltz to remain in his role.
Trump officials accidentally invited the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic to their Signal group chat. Hours after bombs dropped on Yemen, they partied at a $1-million-per-seat Mar-a-Lago dinner.
Trump officials face Senate and House hearings over a Signal chat leak alleging classified military intel, including Yemen strike plans. Democrats demand accountability while Republicans claim it was a one-time mistake that won’t recur.
Defense Sec. Hegseth denies accidentally texting sensitive war plans in a Signal group with top officials. He labels Jeffrey Goldberg, who published messages about potential Houthi strikes, as deceitful, while officials refute sharing operational details.
Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, was accidentally added to a Signal group chat where senior Trump administration officials discussed upcoming military strikes.
U.S. national security leaders mistakenly added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal chat detailing classified plans to attack Yemen’s Houthis, leaving Goldberg astonished at using the app for imminent war discussions.
It's unclear whether the incident represents a breach of the Espionage Act.
"Shocking recklessness" in leak of detailed Yemen bombing plan in Signal chat.
Trump’s national security adviser mistakenly added The Atlantic’s editor to a private text on bombing Yemen, exposing classified debates over military plans and messaging among top officials. The breach has sparked investigations and political backlash over mishandled secrets.
Trump’s national security adviser accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor in a group chat where top officials discussed secret bombing plans in Yemen. The leak revealed debates over messaging and Europe’s role, sparking an investigation into classified information mishandling.
Congress members condemned a Trump administration security lapse when The Atlantic’s editor was accidentally added to a sensitive Signal chat on Yemen airstrikes. Lawmakers demanded a full investigation and firings over the use of non-secure networks.
Congress members from both parties decried a national security breach after The Atlantic's editor-in-chief was mistakenly added to a sensitive Trump admin Signal chat on Yemen airstrikes. Lawmakers demand a full investigation and firings due to the use of non-secure networks for confidential discussions.
14 stories from sources in 291.3 hour(s) #cybersecurity #tech-policy #it-security #mobile-applications #defense-tech
Cloudflare Unleashes an AI-Driven Maze to Block Crawlers
France blocks government encryption backdoor measure
FCC blocks mergers over DEI policies
U.S. Section 230 Overhaul on the Horizon
DOGE Cuts Spark Broad Concerns
France blocks government encryption backdoor measure
US Border Digital Privacy Concerns
DeepSeek Gains Traction Amid Open-Source AI Debates
OpenAI integrates Anthropic’s MCP standard
OpenAI delays ChatGPT image feature for free users
Musk’s Pentagon Visit and China War Plan Controversy
Boeing Awarded USAF Next‐Gen Fighter Contract
Trump defends national security adviser amid Signal group chat controversy
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is intended for general informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the content. Users are encouraged to verify all details independently. We accept no liability for errors, omissions, or any decisions made based on this information.